Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Budget is governor's best yet, Democrats say - But leaders vow fight against some proposals
San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 1/11/06 | Bill Ainsworth

Posted on 01/11/2006 5:11:14 PM PST by NormsRevenge

SACRAMENTO – Democratic legislative leaders praised Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's budget yesterday as the best he's proposed since coming to office in late 2003.

Yet they issued harsh criticism in the few areas in which they disagree with the governor.

Legislative Democrats say they will fight Schwarzenegger's proposal to freeze cost-of-living increases for the poor and disabled, resist his proposal to cut child care funds for welfare recipients and block his request to give the governor new powers to make midyear budget cuts.

They even suggested they might seek voter approval to delay the implementation of Schwarzenegger's pet project: a ballot measure he sponsored in 2002 to fund after-school programs for schools.

A delay in implementing Proposition 49, which the Legislative Analyst's Office has advocated, could free about $428 million for other programs this year.

Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, D-Los Angeles, demonstrated the Democrats' mixed reaction yesterday, calling the budget "leaps and bounds" above the previous two submitted by Schwarzenegger.

But he also said the governor has tried to balance the budget at the cost of the poor.

Assembly Democrats, Núñez said, would not accept Schwarzenegger's proposal for a 15-month delay in the federal cost-of-living adjustment for poor, aged and disabled people who receive grants from the SSI/SSP program.

"It's totally unacceptable. It's not going to happen," he said. "It'll happen over my dead body in this legislative session."

By contrast, Republicans offered more uniformly positive reviews.

"I am pleased that the governor has proposed a budget that does not raise taxes on hard-working Californians," said Assembly Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield.

Schwarzenegger's budget needs approval by two-thirds of the Democrat-dominated Legislature. Normally, a proposed budget amounts to an opening bid in a complicated bargaining ritual that doesn't end until summer.

Last year, the Legislature agreed to freeze welfare grants and to delay the federal cost-of-living adjustment for SSI/SSP recipients for three months this year and next.

Schwarzenegger has proposed a new delay. Under his plan, SSI/SSP recipients would have to wait until July 2008 for their federal cost-of-living adjustments, which under current law they would receive in April 2007.

State officials estimate the delay would save $48 million in the next fiscal year and about $185 million the year after.

Schwarzenegger defended his decision.

"We're not picking on anyone," he said. "When you look at the whole thing, you make decisions on thousands of different items. It's all balancing."

But Senate President Pro Tempore Don Perata, D-Oakland, said it was unfair to deprive the state's poorest residents of an increase in funds, especially when so many other programs are growing.

In April, single SSI/SSP recipients will get grants of $836 a month, while couples will get $1,472 a month.

"George Bush, for crying out loud, who is as flint-hearted as they come, let go with his cold dead fingers of $50 million targeted for the elderly and now we're going to go and rip that off from them. Does that seem very responsible?" Perata said.

Schwarzenegger also has proposed cutting about $200 million in welfare spending, including $114 million in child care funds for welfare recipients.

During his talk yesterday, Schwarzenegger also offered a scaled down version of Proposition 76, which would have given the governor broad new powers to cut the budget. Voters rejected the measure in November.

Schwarzenegger proposed giving governors new authority to deal with budget crises by granting them the power to make midyear cuts. Education funding could not be cut under his proposal, however.

Núñez rejected the idea.

"The voters already spoke to that. They don't want to hand the governor over more power," he said. State Sen. Wes Chesbro, D-Arcata, said the governor and the Legislature already have the power to make budget cuts together under Proposition 58.

Chesbro, chairman of the Senate budget committee, said disputes between the Legislature and the governor are more narrow than last year, when Schwarzenegger sought significant cuts in health programs and state employee pensions and proposed less money for schools than education groups believed they were owed.

As a result, he said, this year's proposed budget presents an opportunity for the governor and the Legislature to reach an agreement more quickly.

"In general, it's a better budget than we've seen in a long time," Chesbro said. "But there are some major problems."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: best; budget; calbudget; california; democrats; leaders; proposals

1 posted on 01/11/2006 5:11:17 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Schwarzenegger also has proposed cutting about $200 million in welfare spending, including $114 million in child care funds for welfare recipients.

Good for Schwarzenegger.

2 posted on 01/11/2006 5:24:23 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Let's line up every yokel who wanted to change the Constitution so this socialist/nazi could be elected President, and laugh at them till they want to dig a hole and crawl in.


3 posted on 01/11/2006 5:24:24 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I predicted this would happen. The Democrats don't care about infrastructure. They do care about the groups dependent on government who receive benefits from it who vote for them and the Democrats intend to see it to it social spending remains uninterrupted. So what if California's brick and mortar is crumbling? What's important is every welfare recipient receive that annual COLA increase. Never mind if we can't drive on a new freeway. The Democrats have figured keeping as many people on the state dole is their ticket to remaining in power.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

4 posted on 01/11/2006 5:30:24 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
I'd rather have every penny of state money going into the Gov's infrastructure projects if the taxpayers don't get a refund. But that's exactly why the Democrats don't want to see California prepared for the future. That's not where the votes for them are.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

5 posted on 01/11/2006 5:33:09 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Ahnold has often said that he admires Pat Brown. Massive infrastructure was built under PB's leadership.


6 posted on 01/11/2006 5:43:36 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I'd rather have every penny of state money going into the Gov's infrastructure projects if the taxpayers don't get a refund.

I'm a little confused. Did you intend to say: even if the taxpayers don't get a refund.

I have a mixed reaction to: Democrats don't want to see California prepared for the future. That's not where the votes for them are.

Yes, Democrats pander to their base for voting support.
No, Democrats depend on unions for campaign contributions.

7 posted on 01/11/2006 5:45:31 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
But he also said the governor has tried to balance the budget at the cost of the poor.

This is very confusing to me. In a secular socialist welfare state like California, doesn't the bulk of the budget find it's way into the pockets of "the poor" by one means or another? Welfare, health care, schools, food stamps, etc., etc.?

8 posted on 01/11/2006 5:50:33 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Nice to finally see a nice thread about the Gov. The Dem posturing and theatrics here is truly shameless. The state gains nothing from investing in welfare dependency building giveaways. Increasing health care access for children was a nice touch, although the state still is too inept to enroll eligible people into it as it is.


9 posted on 01/11/2006 5:53:26 PM PST by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
With this Legislature you and I know the Democrats will never refund the taxpayers a single penny. That's why I rhetorically framed my observation in the hypothetical. And speaking of the hypothetical, we're not going to have Pat Brown's legacy renewed either. This is a different time and a different Democratic Party.

Yeah a voting base that expects the limitless growth of government and more checks. Its the unions that run the State Capitol. The Democrats themselves are just supporting players in the drama the former have scripted.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

10 posted on 01/11/2006 5:56:37 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
ROFL. Calcowgirl and Carrie Okie would nominate that for the funniest statement of the year. The budget spends I think 5% more than last year and its beyond me how Fabian Nunez can characterize the budget as "balanced." It must be the new math. And most of the spending is going to education. See, the Democrats' dilemma is there isn't enough in the pot for all their constituents. So I think we're going to see a clash between the education interests and the welfare establishment. One will end up being the winner and in the end push comes to shove, its the teachers' unions who'll carry the day.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

11 posted on 01/11/2006 6:01:54 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why is it the best? Does it increase waste, fraud, abuse and overall spending on pork by 100%?


12 posted on 01/11/2006 6:03:09 PM PST by Fledermaus (Please explain the difference between Al-Qaeda and the Left? Anyone? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
CA: Budget is governor's best yet, Democrats say

The seal of approval every Republican must have /sarcasm

13 posted on 01/11/2006 6:13:09 PM PST by lowbridge (All that is needed for evil to triumph is for "RINOS" to do something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
a different Democratic Party.

An overlooked, little understood, little discussed but accurate observation.

During Edmond Brown's administration, cultural/racial minorities had little political power in California, not even in the CADEM. Unions prevailed only in the large, metropolitan areas, principally in Los Angeles and San Francisco Counties because of the traditional, heavy industries in those locations.

Today, racial/cultural minority blocs from Los Angeles County have risen to positions of leadership and power in the California Assembly and will soon do so in the Senate. Unions hold sway in both the Assembly and Senate, principally because they have been successful in unionizing government employment.

It would be nearly impossible in California today to pass "open shop"/"right-to-work" legislation or eliminate the "prevailing wage" provision of state contracts, even without federal participation.

14 posted on 01/11/2006 6:23:12 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
You can NEVER out-pander the Slave Party.
15 posted on 01/11/2006 7:40:28 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Lancey Howard; Carry_Okie
doesn't the bulk of the budget find it's way into the pockets of "the poor" ...

ROFL. Calcowgirl and Carrie Okie would nominate that for the funniest statement of the year.

LOL. Actually, I think a good portion of the budget goes into the pockets of the rich, in the form of pork and other shenanigans.

The budget spends I think 5% more than last year...

The general fund increased by 8.7%, the total budget by 7%. The general fund is up 37% from when Arnold took office. Here are some number comparisons I posted

16 posted on 01/11/2006 7:50:26 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Yep. The Democrats came to power in 1958 in no small part over the "right to work" issue. This has always been a unionized state but as you observed the demographics have changed significantly. Older unions were concentrated in the private sector but because of steep membership declines they've been supplanted by public unions that have enrolled most of the state's employees. And of course the most prominent of these unions is the correctional guards union. Its a cottage industry in California.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

17 posted on 01/11/2006 9:58:50 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
A 7% increase over last year. There's still the structural deficit that hasn't been addressed. The Democrats have lots of pork to offer - the only question is if it will satisfy every one who votes for them at election time.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

18 posted on 01/11/2006 10:01:41 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson